[lestat-jin]

apologies for the formatting issue, no idea how to fix it…

[lestat-jin]

Thanks, noticed other places reset_index() is needed for xgroup in order to plot properly in addition to the one reported, code updated manually.

[lestat-jin]

thanks!

[lestat-jin]

Thanks a lot! guess my data is really messed up that the init.q cannot be run properly.

[lestat-jin]

says couldn’t find init.q file after the steps… not quite sure why as I can see them on terminals.

[lestat-jin]

restarted kernel and didnt work….

I had a look at the data and it seems trade table is not defined, rather there is a trade_compressed table. could it be the reason since code referring to trade variable?see below screenshot,

thanks,

[lestat-jin]

Thanks a lot. could you explain why dyadic function is expected here? what is the f in “x f\ y” here? the {8>count x}{x,sum -2#x}\0 1 only takes one argument which is x…

[lestat-jin]

Thanks, 🙂

[lestat-jin]

I see, thanks!

[lestat-jin]

thanks, that is very helpful!

[lestat-jin]

Thanks, so in the second version (functional form, ‘ in front of one func argument), this is read as signal? in general each should not be put in a function form?

[lestat-jin]

Sure, thanks.

SmartSelect_20240628_154856_Samsung-Internet.jpg 293 KB Image File - Click to view

Options

• Copy Download Link

[lestat-jin]

I see, should be 1.0 in the manual construction, thanks a lot!

[lestat-jin]

using a different approach and now it passed the section testing:

corKey:`edge`qty`numTrds

correlations:cor[timeSeries[edge]] each timeSeries[corKey]

edgeCor:corKey!correlations

 

the results visually identical, though the earlier approach failed with 4.7 format testing:

edgeCor:`edge`qty`numTrds! (1;cor[timeSeries[`edge];timeSeries[`qty]];cor[timeSeries[`edge];timeSeries[`numTrds]])

would be good to understand why (cannot see how the testing function 4.7 written so cannot debug…) Thanks.

 

P.S. apologies borrowing the thread, let me know if should create a separate discussion for this.

 

capstone-4.7.png 61 KB Image File - Click to view

Options

• Copy Download Link

[lestat-jin]

just to borrow the thread as I’m stuck on this as well: so I managed to complete the task with script:

edgeCor:`edge`qty`numTrds!(1;cor[timeSeries[`edge];timeSeries[`qty]];cor[timeSeries[`edge];timeSeries[`numTrds]])

 

the output is a dictionary with type 99h and values of 1 0.8059053 0.7830214

however it failed the section testing with 4.7 error: “edgeCor Has Correct Format”

 

I didn’t implement it with iterators but I don’t think that is the reason it failed the test. not sure why it says incorrect format–do I need to output values in percentage terms (there is no way in Q to output a numeric in % without converting it into string first?)

 

any ideas please? thanks!