Re: wavg implementation detail

[leahs]

Hello Ian,

Thank you for bringing this great question to our attention.

• We can confirm that

  0 wavg x

  should indeed be 0n. This is a bug and will be fixed by our team. Thank you for sharing this observation.

The following is an explanation for the other cases:

• Atoms on both sides behave as if enlisted to single item vectors.

5 wavg 5  / 5 enlist[5] wavg enlist[5] /5

• An atom on one side and a vector on the other behaves as if the atom is repeated to match the length of the vector.

2 wavg 2 3 7  / 4 2 2 2 wavg 2 3 7 /4  5 2 3 wavg 3  / 3 5 2 3 wavg 3 3 3 /3

We hope our feedback is helpful for you.

Thank you again for your contribution and engagement with our KX community. We look forward to more.

Kind regards,

Leah