-
Is it save to write to the same sym file by 2 or more q processes currently
Hello,
I have a concern when 2 or more q processes a writing/updating the enumeration in a single sym file by .Q.en[] or ‘:/<sympath>/sym?newsymbols concurrently. Do these operations are multi-process safe? I am a little confused in the documentation:
The file is locked at a process level for writing during .Q.en only. Avoid reading from any file which may be being written to.
The system call used is https://linux.die.net/man/3/lockf.
Does this means that only .Q.en[] is performing the locking?
(Referring to the documentation) ‘:/<sympath>/sym?newsymbols should also uses the file lock, is this correct?
Thank you very much.
Jacky
-
This discussion was modified 1 week, 2 days ago by
jackyyuk.
-
This discussion was modified 1 week, 2 days ago by jackyyuk.
-
This discussion was modified 1 week, 2 days ago by
-
2 Replies
-
.Q.en uses ?. It is ? that does the locking. So both at the same time is fine.
See:
https://code.kx.com/q/ref/enum-extend/#filepath
-
This reply was modified 1 week, 2 days ago by rocuinneagain.
-
This reply was modified 1 week, 2 days ago by rocuinneagain.
code.kx.com
Enum Extend | Reference | kdb+ and q documentation - kdb+ and q documentation
Enum Extend is a q operator that extends an enumeration.
-
Thanks so much😀
-
This reply was modified 1 week, 2 days ago by
Log in to reply.